The least we can ask them is to wait as we can’t reject their application. The answer sheets on these tray show up on the computer of the respected teachers where they have to assess this answer paper first and then proceed with the remaining answer sheets. Officials said that because of all these unwanted applications, the genuine applications are overlooked.When a student contacts the help desk team for his/her confidential mark sheet, the application is put on a ‘priority tray’. However because of China PVC sheets factory such cases, the needy ones’ applications are pushed behind.Mumbai: When the University of Mumbai (MU) came up with the idea of ‘help desk’, the idea was to quickly provide students their  ‘confidential mark sheet’ that will help them with obtaining admissions at universities abroad or within the country.”.Another official said, “Help desk has been set up mainly for those students whose admissions are on hold at other universities.” Upgradation refers to promotion in employment.An official on the condition of anonymity told The Asian Age, “Because of massive publicity that the help desk has got through various mediums, even students who want to get upgradation on their job position are coming to us to get their mark sheet. However, because of too many applicants’ answer sheets being put on the priority tray, the genuinely important ones are left behind. However, the varsity officials now complain that since last week, a majority of students approaching the help desk do so not for obtaining the mark sheet for further studies but for job-related emergencies.

The new legislation has provisions for a steep 120 per cent tax and penalty on undisclosed foreign assets and income, besides carrying a jail term of up to 10 years.. &PVC sheets factory39;The law was brought by the Modi government in 2015 as part of its drive against black money and to prosecute those Indians who have secretly stashed illicit wealth abroad. The charge sheets or prosecution complaints have been filed by the department before a special court in Chennai under Section 50 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015, officials said. Karti had refused to join the probe stating that he had already submitted the details of the asset and related transactions undertaken in 2017 to another tax authority, and that "parallel proceedings" cannot take place against an # individual under the same law.37 crore, property worth Rs 80 lakh in the same country and asset worth Rs 3.Chennai: The Income Tax department on Friday filed four charge sheets against former Union finance minister Chidambaram's wife Nalini, son Karti and daughter-in-law Srinidhi under the Black Money Act for allegedly not disclosing their foreign assets. The department had recently issued notices to Karti and his family members in the case which he had challenged before the Madras High Court. The new anti-black money law deals with cases of overseas illegal assets, which till recently were probed under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The charge sheets claimed that the Chidambaram's "did not disclose" these investments to the tax authority as also by the firm co-owned by Karti-- Chess Global Advisory, in violation of the black money law. The writ petition was later quashed by the high court.  Nalini Chidambaram, Karti and Srinidhi have been charged for allegedly not disclosing, either partly or fully, immovable assets like the one at Cambridge in the UK worth Rs 5. Officials said the charge sheet has been filed as the investigation of the case had reached its "logical conclusion" and thus it could be presented before the court. The income tax department had slapped the Black Money Act against Karti in 2017 after it found that assets created by him abroad were in alleged violation of the law.28 crore in the US, they said.